What is design assist?
Design assist is a project delivery method where the contractor is involved in the design process, providing input on constructability, materials, and methods to optimize the design and ensure that it can be built within the budget and schedule constraints. The design team remains responsible for the design and prepares the construction documents.
The contractor’s role in the design process may include:

• Reviewing the design for constructability

Providing input on materials and methods
Identifying opportunities for value engineering

• Developing preliminary construction budgets and schedules

Providing feedback on procurement strategies and contracting approaches

What are the benefits of design assist?
There are several benefits to using design assist as a project delivery method:

• Early involvement of the contractor:
  By involving the contractor in the design process, owners can take advantage of the contractor’s expertise in construction methods, materials, and scheduling. This early involvement can help identify potential construction issues early in the design process, avoiding costly design changes and delays during construction.
• Improved constructability:
  By providing input on constructability, materials, and methods, the contractor can help optimize the design for efficient and cost-effective construction. This can lead to improved quality, reduced construction costs, and faster project delivery.
• Increased collaboration:
  Design assist encourages collaboration and communication between the design team and the construction team, fostering a team-oriented approach to project delivery. This can lead to better decision-making, improved project outcomes, and a more positive project experience for all stakeholders.
• Cost certainty:
  By involving the contractor in the design process and developing preliminary construction budgets and schedules, owners can gain a greater degree of cost certainty and avoid costly change orders during construction.
• Reduced risk:
  Design assist can help reduce the risk of construction-related issues by identifying potential issues early in the design process and developing strategies to mitigate those risks.
• Value engineering:
  Design assist provides opportunities for value engineering, where the contractor can identify cost-saving opportunities without compromising the design intent or quality.
• When to use design assist:
  Design assist can be used for a variety of projects, but it is particularly well-suited for complex projects with unique design requirements, tight budgets, or aggressive schedules. It can also be used for projects where the owner wants to maintain control of the design but also wants the benefit of the contractor’s input on constructability and cost.
  Design assist is best utilized when the owner is willing to engage in a collaborative project delivery method and is open to input from both the design team and the construction team.
• Conclusion:
  Design assist is a collaborative project delivery method that can provide a range of benefits to owners. By involving the contractor in the design process, owners can take advantage of the contractor’s expertise in construction methods, materials, and scheduling to optimize the design and ensure that it can be built efficiently and cost-effectively.
  The early involvement of the contractor can help identify potential construction issues early in the design process, avoiding costly design changes and delays during construction. Additionally, the collaborative nature of the process can foster a team-oriented approach to project delivery,

What is the difference between design assist and a traditional tender in construction?
Design Assist and traditional tender are two approaches to construction procurement. The main difference between them is the level of involvement of the contractors in the design process.
In a traditional tender, the owner or the architect develops the design and produces a set of construction documents. Then, these documents are sent to contractors to bid on the project based on the specifications and drawings provided. The contractor who submits the lowest bid and meets the qualifications set forth by the owner is awarded the contract.
On the other hand, in design assist, the contractor is involved in the design process from the early stages of the project. The owner or the architect typically provides a general scope of work, and the contractor works collaboratively with the design team to develop the project’s design and construction documents. The contractor provides input on the feasibility, cost, and constructability of the design, and the team collaborates to ensure that the project is delivered on time and on budget.
The key advantage of the design assist approach is that the contractor’s expertise can be leveraged to optimize the design and construction process, resulting in better quality, cost savings, and reduced risk. In a traditional tender, the contractor’s input is limited to pricing and the construction process, which can lead to missed opportunities for value engineering and collaboration.
In summary, the main difference between design assist and traditional tender is the level of involvement of the contractor in the design process. In design assist, the contractor is involved from the early stages of the project, collaborating with the design team to optimize the design and construction process, while in traditional tender, the contractor’s involvement is limited to pricing and construction. In short, Design Assist de-risks a project.

Where in the construction design process should you start using design assist?
This is a very commonly asked question, with good reason.
The design assist approach can be used at any stage of the construction design process, depending on the project’s specific needs and goals. But it’s most effective when used in the early stages of the design process, typically during the schematic design and design development phases.
During the schematic design phase, the owner or the architect establishes the project’s goals, scope, and constraints. The design assist contractor can be brought on board to provide early feedback on the feasibility and cost implications of the project’s design concepts. The contractor can help identify potential issues and provide value engineering recommendations to optimize the design and construction process, helping to avoid costly landmines.
During the design development phase, the design is refined, and the construction documents are prepared. The contractor can continue to provide input on the construction feasibility, cost, and constructability, and help identify and resolve any issues that arise.
Starting the design assist process early can help ensure that the project is delivered on time and on budget, and can lead to better quality, reduced risk, and cost savings.
However, even if the project is well underway, it is still possible to bring in a design assist contractor to provide value engineering and construction optimization recommendations. Although, the earlier a design assist team is brought into the project, the more effective the results.

What are the steps in design assist?
The specific steps in the design assist process can vary depending on the project’s scope and needs, but typically include the following:

• Project Initiation: The owner or the architect engages with the design assist contractor to discuss the project’s goals, scope, and constraints.
• Pre-construction Phase: The contractor works collaboratively with the design team to review the project’s design concepts, feasibility, and cost implications. The contractor provides input on constructability, materials, and methods to optimize the design and ensure that it can be built within the budget and schedule constraints.
• Construction Documentation: As the design is refined and the construction documents are prepared, the contractor continues to provide input on the construction feasibility, cost, and constructability, and help identify and resolve any issues that arise.
• Construction Phase: The contractor works with the construction team to ensure that the design is built according to the specifications and drawings. The contractor provides input on materials, equipment, and methods to optimize construction efficiency and quality.
• Post-construction Phase: The contractor conducts a post-construction review to evaluate the project’s success and identify areas for improvement in future projects.
  Throughout the design assist process, collaboration and communication are essential to ensure that the project is delivered on time, on budget, and to the required quality standards. The contractor works closely with the owner, the architect, and other project stakeholders to identify and resolve issues and optimize the design and construction process.

How does design assist reduce risk for the owner?
Design assist can help reduce risk for the owner in several ways:

• Early Identification of Issues: By involving the contractor in the design process, issues related to constructability, cost, and feasibility can be identified and addressed early on. This helps reduce the risk of costly change orders and delays during construction
• Value Engineering: The contractor can provide input on materials, equipment, and methods that can optimize the design and reduce costs while maintaining the required quality standards. This can help reduce the risk of cost overruns and ensure that the project is delivered within the budget.
• Collaboration and Communication: Design assist promotes collaboration and communication between the owner, the design team, and the contractor. This helps ensure that everyone is working towards the same goals and objectives, and that issues are addressed and resolved in a timely manner.
• Quality Control: The contractor can provide input on construction methods and techniques that can optimize quality and reduce the risk of defects or failures during construction and after occupancy.
• Reduced Liability: By involving the contractor in the design process, the owner can reduce their liability exposure. The contractor assumes responsibility for ensuring that the design can be built within the budget and schedule constraints and meets the required quality standards.

In summary, design assist can help reduce risk for the owner by identifying issues early on, providing value engineering recommendations, promoting collaboration and communication, optimizing quality control, and reducing liability exposure.

How does design assist differ from design build?
Design assist and design-build are both project delivery methods that involve the integration of the design and construction processes. However, the main difference between the two is the level of involvement of the contractor in the design process.
In design-build, the contractor is responsible for both the design and construction of the project. The owner typically contracts with a single entity, the design-builder, who is responsible for delivering the project from start to finish. The design-builder is responsible for both the design and construction, and assumes responsibility for ensuring that the project is delivered within the budget, schedule, and quality requirements.
In design assist, the contractor is involved in the design process but is not responsible for the design. The owner typically contracts separately with the design team and the contractor. The design team develops the design and prepares the construction documents, and the contractor provides input on constructability, materials, and methods to optimize the design and ensure that it can be built within the budget and schedule constraints.
The key advantage of design-build is that the owner has a single point of contact for the entire project, which can simplify communication and reduce the risk of coordination issues. Design-build also offers the potential for faster project delivery, as the design and construction can proceed simultaneously.
The advantage of design assist is that it allows the contractor to provide input on construction feasibility, cost, and constructability, while leaving the design responsibility with the design team. This can lead to better quality, cost savings, and reduced risk.
Additionally, the design assist approach can be used with any delivery method, including design-bid-build and construction management, while design-build is a specific delivery method.
In summary, the main difference between design assist and design-build is the level of involvement of the contractor in the design process. In design-build, the contractor is responsible for both the design and construction, while in design assist, the contractor provides input on constructability, materials, and methods to optimize the design but is not responsible for the design.

How does design assist differ from integrated project delivery?
Design assist and integrated project delivery (IPD) are both collaborative project delivery methods that emphasize early involvement and communication between project stakeholders. However, there are some key differences between the two methods.
In design assist, the contractor is involved in the design process but is not responsible for the design. The contractor provides input on constructability, materials, and methods to optimize the design and ensure that it can be built within the budget and schedule constraints. The design team remains responsible for the design and prepares the construction documents.
In IPD, the owner, the design team, and the contractor form a collaborative team that works together throughout the project’s lifecycle, from design through construction and occupancy. The team shares risks, rewards, and decision-making responsibilities, and uses an integrated process to optimize project outcomes.
The key features of IPD include:

• Collaborative team: The owner, the design team, and the contractor form a collaborative team that works together throughout the project.
• Shared risk and reward: The team shares risks and rewards based on project outcomes.
• Integrated process: The team uses an integrated process that emphasizes early involvement, communication, and collaboration to optimize project outcomes.
• Early involvement: The team is involved in the project from the earliest stages, including programming, design, and preconstruction.
• Lean principles: The team uses lean principles to optimize efficiency, reduce waste, and improve project outcomes.

The advantage of IPD is that it creates a collaborative team environment that promotes communication, transparency, and shared decision-making. This can lead to better project outcomes, including improved quality, reduced costs, and faster delivery. However, IPD requires a high level of trust and commitment from all project stakeholders and may not be suitable for all projects.
In summary, the main difference between design assist and IPD is the level of collaboration and shared decision-making between project stakeholders. In design assist, the contractor provides input on constructability, materials, and methods but is not responsible for the design, while in IPD, the owner, the design team, and the contractor form a collaborative team that shares risks, rewards, and decision-making responsibilities throughout the project.

Which is better, design assist, bid/tender, design build or IPD?
There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question, as the best project delivery method depends on the specific needs and goals of the project, as well as the preferences and capabilities of the project stakeholders. Each project delivery method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of delivery method should be based on a careful evaluation of these factors.
Design assist is a good option when the owner wants to involve the contractor in the design process to optimize constructability, materials, and methods, but prefers to keep design responsibility with the design team.
Bid/tender is a traditional project delivery method where the owner contracts separately with the design team and the construction team, and the construction team is selected through a competitive bidding process. This method can be appropriate for projects with a well-defined scope and a fixed budget and schedule.
Design-build is a good option when the owner wants a single point of contact for the entire project, with the contractor responsible for both the design and construction. This method can be appropriate for projects where the design and construction need to proceed concurrently, or where fast-track construction is required.
IPD is a good option when the owner wants a collaborative team environment that promotes communication, transparency, and shared decision-making. This method can be appropriate for complex projects with multiple stakeholders, where there is a high degree of uncertainty or risk, or where the project goals are not well-defined.
Ultimately, the choice of project delivery method should be based on a careful evaluation of the project goals, constraints, and risks, as well as the capabilities and preferences of the project stakeholders. It is important to involve all key stakeholders in the
decision-making process to ensure that the chosen delivery method meets their needs and expectations.

Why should I use the design assist process?
Design Assist is a project delivery method that involves the contractor in the design process, collaborating with the design team to optimize constructability, materials, and methods. This method provides a valuable opportunity to improve the project’s quality, schedule, and budget by leveraging the contractor’s expertise and experience.
The process starts with the owner selecting a design team to develop the project’s design. The owner then selects a contractor to work alongside the design team. The contractor is responsible for providing input on constructability, materials, and methods to optimize the design, while the design team remains responsible for the design and prepares the construction documents.
The contractor’s input typically focuses on the feasibility of constructing the project based on budget and schedule constraints. They provide value engineering suggestions, constructability reviews, and cost estimating services. The design team remains responsible for the design, including making decisions regarding the project’s aesthetics, function, and code compliance.
The Design Assist process must involve a high level of collaboration between the contractor and the design team. They work together to identify potential design issues, develop alternative solutions, and make adjustments to the design to improve constructability, reduce costs, and enhance the project’s quality. This collaboration ensures that the final design is optimized for the construction phase of the project.
Benefits of Design Assist
There are several benefits to using the Design Assist method for construction projects. The most significant advantages include:

• Improved constructability: The contractor’s input during the design phase can help identify constructability issues before construction begins. This can help reduce construction delays and change orders, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective construction process.
• Cost savings: By involving the contractor in the design process, the team can identify opportunities to reduce construction costs through value engineering, material selection, and process improvements.
• Schedule optimization: Early collaboration between the contractor and the design team can help identify potential schedule conflicts and opportunities to reduce construction duration. This can help ensure that the project is completed on time and within budget.
• Quality improvement: The collaboration between the contractor and the design team can lead to a higher quality final product, as potential issues are identified and resolved early in the design process.
• Risk mitigation: By involving the contractor early in the project, risks associated with constructability, materials, and methods can be identified and mitigated before construction begins. This can help reduce the likelihood of project delays, cost overruns, and other potential risks.

What are the potential drawbacks of design assist?
While the Design Assist process has many benefits, there are also potential drawbacks to consider. These include:

• Increased upfront costs: The Design Assist process may require additional upfront costs for the contractor’s involvement in the design phase. However, these costs may be offset by savings realized during the construction phase.
• Increased project complexity: The Design Assist process can increase the complexity of the project, as multiple parties are involved in the design process. Effective communication and collaboration are essential to ensure that the project is delivered on time and within budget.
• Potential for conflicts of interest: The contractor’s involvement in the design process may create conflicts of interest, as they have a vested interest in reducing construction costs. However, these conflicts can be managed through effective communication and collaboration between the contractor and the design team.
• Conclusion:
  Design Assist is an innovative project delivery method that can provide significant benefits for construction projects. The early involvement of the contractor in the design process can help optimize constructability, reduce costs, and enhance the project’s quality. While there are potential drawbacks to this approach, effective communication and collaboration between the contractor and the design team can minimize risks.

What are the risks in using design assist?
While the use of design assist can provide numerous benefits for a construction project, there are also several risks that should be considered before deciding to use this approach. Some of the risks associated with design assist include:

• Increased cost: One of the potential risks of using design assist is the increased cost associated with involving the contractor early on in the design process. This may result in higher fees for the contractor’s services during the design phase, which can increase the overall project budget. However, it is important to note that this additional cost may be offset by savings realized during the construction phase through the optimization of constructability and materials.
• Conflict of interest: Another risk of design assist is the potential for conflicts of interest between the contractor and the design team. Since the contractor has a financial interest in reducing construction costs, there is a possibility that they may provide recommendations that conflict with the design team’s goals for the project. This can lead to disagreements and delays in the project’s completion.
• Changes to the design: Design assist involves close collaboration between the contractor and the design team. While this can be beneficial, it can also result in changes to the original design. If changes are made late in the design process, it can result in delays and additional costs.
• Lack of control: Some owners may feel that they have less control over the project when using the design assist approach. Since the contractor has a greater influence on the project’s design, there may be concerns about losing control over the project’s outcome.
• Unforeseen complications: Despite the collaboration between the contractor and the design team, unforeseen complications can still arise during the construction phase. If these complications require significant changes to the project’s design, it can result in additional costs and delays.
• Conclusion
  While design assist can provide numerous benefits for a construction project, there are also several risks that should be considered before deciding to use this approach. It is important to weigh the benefits against the potential risks and determine if design assist is the right approach for a particular project. Effective communication and collaboration between the contractor and the design team can help mitigate some of the potential risks associated with design assist.

How do you resolve disputes in design assist?
Disputes can arise in any construction project, and design assist is no exception. When disputes occur in a design assist project, it is important to resolve them quickly and efficiently to minimize delays and additional costs. Here are some ways to resolve disputes in design assist:

• Open communication: The key to resolving disputes in any construction project is open communication between all parties involved. When a dispute arises in a design assist project, it is important to discuss the issue openly and honestly with all parties involved. This can help to identify the root cause of the dispute and develop a plan to resolve it.
• Review the contract: The contract between the owner, design team, and contractor should include provisions for resolving disputes. The contract may specify a dispute resolution process that must be followed, such as mediation or arbitration. It is important to review the contract and follow the agreed-upon dispute resolution process to resolve the dispute.
• Seek expert advice: If the dispute cannot be resolved through open communication or the contract’s dispute resolution process, it may be necessary to seek expert advice. This could involve hiring a third-party mediator or arbitrator to help resolve the dispute.
• Consider litigation as a last resort: Litigation should be considered a last resort in resolving disputes in design assist projects. It can be time-consuming, costly, and may damage relationships between parties involved in the project. It is always better to try to resolve disputes through open communication and alternative dispute resolution processes before resorting to litigation.
• Focus on finding a solution: When a dispute arises, it is important to focus on finding a solution rather than assigning blame. By working together to find a solution, all parties involved can move forward with the project and avoid further delays and costs.

In summary, resolving disputes in design assist projects requires open communication, following the contract’s dispute resolution process, seeking expert advice when necessary, considering litigation as a last resort, and focusing on finding a solution rather than assigning blame.

Does design assist eliminate change notices?
Design assist does not necessarily eliminate change notices. Change notices may still be necessary if there are changes to the project scope, design, or specifications that were not anticipated during the design assist process.
However, the use of design assist can help to reduce the number of change notices needed during construction. By involving the construction team early in the design process, potential issues and challenges can be identified and addressed before construction begins. This can help to minimize changes during construction, reducing the need for change notices.
Additionally, design assist can help to ensure that the design is well-coordinated and constructible. This can help to reduce the likelihood of conflicts or errors during construction, further reducing the need for change notices.
Overall, while design assist may not completely eliminate change notices, it can help to minimize them by improving coordination and communication between the design and construction teams.

What are the best practices for design assist?
Design assist is a collaborative process that involves close coordination between the design team, construction team, and owner to ensure that the project meets the owner’s goals for schedule, budget, and quality. Here are some best practices for design assist:

• Early involvement of the construction team: The construction team should be involved early in the design process, ideally during the concept or schematic design phase. This allows the construction team to provide input on constructability, cost, and schedule considerations.
• Clear communication: Effective communication is essential for the success of design assist. All parties involved should communicate clearly and regularly to ensure that everyone is on the same page regarding project goals, design requirements, and construction needs.
• Defined roles and responsibilities: Clear roles and responsibilities should be defined for each party involved in the design assist process. This includes the owner, design team, and construction team. Each party should understand their role and responsibility in the project and be held accountable for meeting their commitments.
• Regular coordination meetings: Regular coordination meetings should be held throughout the design and construction phases to ensure that the project stays on track and to address any issues or challenges that arise. These meetings should involve all parties involved in the project.
• Risk identification and management: Risk management should be an integral part of the design assist process. All parties should work together to identify potential risks and develop strategies to mitigate them. This can help to avoid delays and additional costs during construction.
• Document control: Effective document control is important for managing the design assist process. All project documents should be managed and distributed in a controlled manner to ensure that everyone has access to the most current information.
• Continuous improvement: Continuous improvement is essential for the success of the design assist process. All parties involved should regularly evaluate the process and identify areas for improvement. This can help to ensure that the project stays on track and meets the owner’s goals for schedule, budget, and quality.

By following these best practices for design assist, owners, design teams, and construction teams can work together to deliver successful projects that meet the owner’s goals and expectations.

Does design assist change the responsibility of the engineer or architect to the owner and project in any way?
No, design assist does not change the responsibility of the engineer or architect to the owner and project in any way. The engineer or architect is still responsible for designing a project that meets the owner’s requirements and specifications, and that complies with all applicable codes, standards, and regulations.
However, the use of design assist can help to improve the coordination and communication between the design team and the construction team, which can ultimately help to improve the quality of the design and reduce the potential for errors or omissions.
In a design assist project, the design team is typically responsible for developing the initial design concept and specifications, and for working collaboratively with the construction team to ensure that the design is constructible and meets the owner’s goals for schedule and budget. The construction team provides input on constructability, cost, and schedule considerations, and may also be responsible for providing feedback on potential design changes or value engineering opportunities.
Ultimately, the engineer or architect retains responsibility for the design of the project, and must ensure that the final design meets all of the owner’s requirements and specifications, and that it complies with all applicable codes, standards, and regulations. The engineer or architect must also work closely with the construction team to ensure that the design is properly implemented during construction, and that any issues or concerns that arise are addressed in a timely and effective manner.

Does design assist provide cost certainty to the owner?
Yes, design assist can provide cost certainty to the owner, but it is not a guarantee. One of the benefits of design assist is that it allows the construction team to provide input on constructability, cost, and schedule considerations during the design phase. This can help to identify potential cost savings opportunities early in the process, and can also help to identify any potential cost overruns or schedule delays.
By involving the construction team early in the process, design assist can help to minimize the potential for cost increases or schedule delays that can occur when the design is not properly coordinated with the construction team. This can help to provide more accurate cost estimates and schedules, which can help to provide cost certainty to the owner.
However, design assist is not a guarantee of cost certainty. Changes can still occur during the construction phase that may impact the final cost of the project. For example, unforeseen site conditions, changes in scope, or changes in market conditions can all impact the final cost of the project.
Overall, design assist can help to improve the accuracy of cost estimates and schedules, which can help to provide cost certainty to the owner, but it’s important to remember that there are always risks and uncertainties associated with construction projects, and that no delivery method can completely eliminate these risks.

How do you pick the right design assist contractor?
This is a good question because picking the right design assist contractor is an important decision that requires careful consideration of several factors. Here are some steps that can be followed to help pick the right design assist contractor:

• Identify project requirements: Before selecting a design assist contractor, it is important to have a clear understanding of the project requirements. This includes understanding the project scope, budget, schedule, and other important details that will impact the selection of the design assist contractor.
• Research potential contractors: Once the project requirements have been identified, it is important to research potential design assist contractors. This can be done by reviewing their experience, qualifications, and past performance on similar projects.
• Conduct interviews: After identifying potential design assist contractors, it is important to conduct interviews to learn more about their capabilities, experience, and approach to design assist. During the interviews, it is important to ask questions about their design process, communication protocols, and project management strategies.
• Evaluate proposals: After conducting interviews, it is important to evaluate proposals submitted by potential design assist contractors. The proposals should include a detailed project plan, including timelines, budgets, and milestones.
• Check references: Before selecting a design assist contractor, it is important to check references. This includes speaking with past clients and reviewing their experience with the contractor. This can provide valuable insights into the contractor’s ability to deliver high-quality work, meet project deadlines, and manage project budgets.
• Review contracts: Once a design assist contractor has been selected, it is important to review the contract carefully. The contract should include clear expectations for project
  deliverables, timelines, and budgets, as well as provisions for dispute resolution and change orders.

By following these steps, it is possible to select a design assist contractor that is well-suited for the project and can deliver high-quality results on time and within budget.

What trades generate the greatest benefit to the project by using the design assist approach?
The benefits of design assist can be realized by any trade involved in the construction process, but some trades may generate greater benefits than others. The following trades are examples of those that may generate the greatest benefit to the project by using the design assist approach:

• Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) trades: MEP systems are critical to the functionality of a building, and can be some of the most complex systems to design and install. By involving MEP contractors in the design assist process, the construction team can identify potential constructability issues early on, and ensure that MEP systems are properly coordinated with other building systems.
• Structural trades: Structural trades, such as steel and concrete contractors, can benefit from the design assist approach by providing input on constructability and sequencing issues. By involving these trades early on in the design process, the construction team can identify potential issues with structural elements and develop strategies to address them.
• Façade trades: Façade contractors can provide input on the design and construction of building envelopes, including curtain walls, windows, and other exterior cladding systems. By involving façade contractors early on in the design process, the construction team can ensure that building envelopes are properly designed and coordinated with other building systems.
• Fire protection trades: Fire protection systems are critical to the safety of a building, and can be some of the most complex systems to design and install. By involving fire protection contractors in the design assist process, the construction team can identify potential issues with fire protection systems and ensure that they are properly coordinated with other building systems.

Overall, any trade involved in the construction process can benefit from the design assist approach, but those that are involved in critical building systems, such as MEP, structural, façade, and fire protection trades, may generate the greatest benefit to the project.

Does the design assist partner get paid?
Yes, the design assist partner gets paid for their services. The design assist process typically involves a formal agreement between the owner, the architect or engineer, and the design assist partner. This agreement outlines the scope of work, deliverables, timelines, and compensation for the design assist partner.
The compensation for the design assist partner can take various forms, including fixed fees, hourly rates, or a percentage of the construction cost. The specific compensation structure will depend on the scope of work and the agreement between the parties.
It is important to note that the design assist partner is typically paid for their services regardless of whether or not their recommendations are ultimately incorporated into the final design. This is because the value of the design assist process lies in identifying potential issues early on in the design process, which can ultimately save time and money during construction.
Overall, the compensation for the design assist partner is an important aspect of the design assist process, and should be carefully negotiated to ensure that both parties are fairly compensated for their services.

Is the design assist fee a part of the trade partners overall construction contract or a separate fee?
The design assist fee is typically a separate fee from the trade partner’s overall construction contract. This fee is for the specific services provided by the design assist partner during the design assist process, which is a distinct phase of the project separate from the actual construction phase.
During the design assist process, the design assist partner provides services such as constructability reviews, value engineering, cost estimating, and coordination with other trades. These services are not part of the trade partner’s scope of work during the construction phase, and therefore are typically billed as a separate fee.
It is possible for the design assist fee to be incorporated into the trade partner’s overall contract, but this would depend on the specific agreement between the parties. In some cases, the design assist partner may also be awarded a separate contract for the design assist services, which is completely separate from the construction contract.
In any case, it is important to clearly define the scope of work, deliverables, timelines, and compensation structure for the design assist services in the contract or agreement between the parties to ensure that everyone understands their roles and responsibilities, and to avoid misunderstandings or disputes later on in the project.

How do you resolve design assist disputes regarding scope inclusions during construction?
Disputes regarding scope inclusions during construction in the context of design assist typically arise when the scope of work agreed upon during the design assist process does not match the final construction documents. To resolve these types of disputes, it is important to have a clear and detailed scope of work agreement in place that outlines the responsibilities and obligations of all parties involved in the project.
Here are some steps that can be taken to resolve design assist disputes regarding scope inclusions during construction:

• Review the scope of work agreement: The first step in resolving any dispute is to review the scope of work agreement to determine if the dispute is a result of a misunderstanding or miscommunication. If there is any ambiguity in the agreement, it should be clarified and documented in writing to avoid further disputes.
• Review construction documents: Compare the construction documents with the scope of work agreement to identify any discrepancies. If there are any differences, it is important to determine whether they are significant enough to warrant a change in scope or a change order.
• Discuss the issue with all parties: The issue should be discussed with all parties involved in the project, including the design assist partner, the architect or engineer, and the trade contractors. The parties should work together to come up with a solution that is in the best interest of the project.
• Consider a change order: If the discrepancy is significant enough to require a change in scope, a change order may be necessary. The change order should outline the scope of work change, the reason for the change, and the cost and timeline implications.
• Mediation or arbitration: If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, mediation or arbitration may be necessary. This involves a neutral third party who will hear both sides of the dispute and make a decision that is binding on all parties.

It is important to have a clear and detailed scope of work agreement in place to minimize the risk of disputes during the design assist process. However, if a dispute does arise, it should be addressed promptly and in a collaborative manner to ensure that the project remains on track and on budget.

If design assist is such a superior delivery method, why don’t all projects use this method?
While design assist can offer several benefits to a construction project, not all projects may be suitable for this delivery method. There are several factors that can influence the decision to use design assist, such as the size and complexity of the project, the level of collaboration and communication required, and the availability of skilled and experienced trade partners.
Here are some reasons why not all projects may use the design assist delivery method:

• Project size and complexity: Smaller and less complex projects may not require the level of coordination and collaboration that is needed for design assist. Additionally, larger and more complex projects may require more specialized expertise that may not be readily available from trade partners.
• Availability of skilled trade partners: Design assist relies heavily on the expertise and knowledge of trade partners. If skilled and experienced trade partners are not available, it may be more difficult to implement this delivery method effectively.
• Owner preferences: Some owners may prefer a more traditional delivery method, such as design-bid-build or design-build, for various reasons, such as familiarity or past success with those methods.
• Cost considerations: While design assist can potentially save costs by reducing the need for change orders and redesign, the added fees for the design assist partner and the potential for additional coordination and communication costs may not be feasible for some projects.
• Contractual and legal considerations: The legal and contractual implications of design assist, such as risk allocation and intellectual property ownership, may not be suitable for all projects.

It is important to carefully consider the specific needs and requirements of each project when selecting a delivery method. While design assist can offer several benefits, it may not be the best option for all projects.

What benefit does the design assist contractor bring to the project that the engineer doesn’t?
The design assist contractor brings a unique set of benefits to the construction project that may not be provided by the engineer or architect. Here are some of the key benefits that the design assist contractor can bring:

• Trade-specific knowledge and expertise: The design assist contractor is typically a specialized trade contractor with in-depth knowledge and expertise in their specific field. This knowledge and expertise can help optimize the design and construction process, resulting in improved quality, efficiency, and cost savings.
• Collaboration and coordination: The design assist contractor works closely with the design team to provide input and feedback throughout the design process. This collaboration and coordination can help ensure that the design is constructible, efficient, and cost-effective.
• Value engineering: The design assist contractor can provide input on alternative materials, construction techniques, and systems that can improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the project. This can result in cost savings for the owner while still maintaining the project requirements and quality standards.
• Risk mitigation: The design assist contractor can help identify potential issues and risks during the design phase, which can be addressed before construction begins. This can help mitigate risks and reduce the likelihood of change orders, delays, and cost overruns during construction.
• Streamlined construction process: The design assist contractor is involved in the project from the early stages of design, which can help ensure that the construction process is streamlined and efficient. This can help reduce the overall project schedule and improve project delivery.

Overall, the design assist contractor brings a unique set of benefits to the project that can
help optimize the design and construction process, improve quality and efficiency, and reduce costs and risks. While the engineer or architect provides the overall design and project management, the design assist contractor offers specialized knowledge and expertise that can be critical to the success of the project.

Now that I have a design assist contractor on my project, can I eliminate the engineer?
While the design assist contractor can bring valuable knowledge and expertise to the project, it is not recommended to eliminate the engineer or architect entirely. The engineer or architect is responsible for providing the overall design and project management, including developing the project specifications, coordinating with other consultants, and ensuring that the project meets all applicable codes and regulations.
The design assist contractor, on the other hand, provides specialized knowledge and expertise in their specific trade. They work closely with the engineer or architect to provide input and feedback throughout the design process, and to help optimize the design and construction process. They are also responsible for providing detailed design drawings and specifications for their specific trade, which are incorporated into the overall project design.
Eliminating the engineer or architect entirely can lead to significant risks and issues, including the potential for design errors, code violations, and construction defects. It is essential to maintain a collaborative and integrated approach to project design and management, with all parties working together to ensure that the project is delivered on time, within budget, and to the required quality standards.

Why does design assist fail?
This is a very important question, as design assist can fail for a variety of reasons, including:

• Lack of Communication: Communication is critical to the success of design assist projects. If there is a lack of communication between the design assist contractor, engineer, architect, and owner, the project can suffer from miscommunication, misunderstandings, and conflicting objectives.
• Lack of Expertise: Design assist contractors are experts in their specific trade, but they may not have the necessary experience or knowledge to provide input on other areas of the project. If the design assist contractor is not experienced enough, they may overlook critical details, resulting in design errors, construction delays, or cost overruns.
• Budget Constraints: Design assist projects require careful budget planning to ensure that the cost of the project is not exceeded. If the budget is not well-planned or is not sufficient, it can lead to the design assist contractor cutting corners, reducing the quality of work, or causing the project to be incomplete.
• Changing Requirements: If the owner or other stakeholders change their requirements during the project, it can lead to design errors, delays, and cost overruns. It is important to have clear and concise requirements from the outset and to communicate any changes in a timely manner to avoid complications.
• Disputes and Conflicts: Disputes or conflicts between the design assist contractor, engineer, architect, and owner can cause project delays and cost overruns. It is important to establish clear expectations and guidelines for communication, dispute resolution, and conflict management.

Overall, the success of a design assist project depends on effective communication, planning, and collaboration among all parties involved. If any of these factors are lacking, it can lead to failure or complications in the project.

Why isn’t design assist the lowest price?
Design assist is not always the lowest price because it is a collaborative process that involves a higher level of expertise and input from the design assist contractor. Design assist contractors are typically experts in their specific trade and have the knowledge and experience to provide input on the design, construction, and installation of their systems.
This level of expertise and collaboration can result in higher upfront costs, but it can also lead to a more efficient and cost-effective project in the long run. Design assist can help to avoid costly change orders, construction delays, and other complications that can arise from a traditional design-bid-build approach.
Additionally, design assist contractors may also invest additional time and resources in the project, such as conducting research on the latest materials and technologies or exploring alternative design options to find the most cost-effective solution.
While design assist may not always be the lowest price upfront, it can ultimately result in cost savings and a more successful project in the long run.

In construction there is a saying, “He who makes the most mistakes wins” – what does this mean and what are the risks to the lowest price?
The saying “He who makes the most mistakes wins” is a cynical way of highlighting a common problem in the construction industry where the lowest bidder is often awarded the contract. The saying implies that the contractor who makes the most mistakes, such as underestimating costs or overlooking important project details, will ultimately end up winning the contract because they have provided the lowest price.
However, this approach can be risky for both the owner and the contractor. When a contractor submits an unrealistically low bid to win the project, they may be forced to cut corners, use inferior materials or rush through the work to stay within budget. This can lead to construction defects, delays, or even project failure.
Furthermore, the lowest price may not always reflect the best value for the owner. A low bid may result in a higher risk of change orders, project delays, and other unexpected costs. Additionally, the lowest price may not always consider important factors such as quality, safety, and long-term performance.
In contrast, using a design assist approach can help to mitigate these risks by involving the contractor in the design process and leveraging their expertise to find the most cost-effective solutions while ensuring quality, safety, and long-term performance. This approach can help to avoid costly mistakes and ensure a successful project outcome.

I want to have a competitive process to select a design assist contractor, is cost the best way to measure multiple options?
While cost is an important factor in selecting a design assist contractor, it should not be the only criterion for evaluation. There are several other factors that should be considered when selecting a design assist contractor, such as:

• Expertise and experience: The design assist contractor should have a proven track record of successfully completing projects of similar scope and complexity.
• Quality of work: The contractor should have a reputation for delivering high-quality work and meeting or exceeding project requirements.
  Technical capabilities: The contractor should have the technical expertise and resources necessary to meet the project’s design and construction requirements.
• Communication and collaboration: The contractor should be able to effectively communicate and collaborate with the owner, design team, and other contractors on the project.
• Safety and risk management: The contractor should have a robust safety program and a proven track record of managing project risks.
  To evaluate these factors, a competitive process that involves a request for proposals (RFP) or request for qualifications (RFQ) can be used. The RFP or RFQ should clearly define the project scope, requirements, and evaluation criteria. The evaluation criteria should be weighted based on their relative importance to the project and the owner’s goals.

Ultimately, the selection of the design assist contractor should be based on a holistic evaluation of their qualifications, experience, and ability to deliver a successful project outcome. While cost is an important factor, it should not be the sole basis for selection.

I’m an owner about to start a construction project and I only care about lowest cost at the start of the project. Is design assist for me?
While cost is an important factor in any construction project, selecting a design assist delivery method based solely on the lowest cost may not be the best approach for every owner. Design assist is a collaborative process that involves input from multiple parties, including the owner, design team, and trade contractors. The design assist approach can help identify potential cost savings and efficiencies during the design and construction phases, but the focus is on delivering a successful project outcome rather than just the lowest cost.
If you are solely focused on the lowest cost at the start of the project, a traditional design-bid-build delivery method may be a better fit for your needs. In this approach, the owner hires a design team to develop the project plans and specifications, and then solicits bids from multiple contractors to perform the construction work. The lowest bidder is typically awarded the contract, and the owner assumes the risk of any design or construction errors.
It’s important to note that while the design-bid-build approach may result in a lower upfront cost, it may not provide the same level of collaboration, efficiency, and risk mitigation that design assist can offer. Therefore, it’s important for owners to carefully evaluate their project goals and priorities before selecting a delivery method.

How does an owner achieve best value in the construction process?
Achieving the best value in the construction process involves considering various factors beyond just the initial cost of the project. Here are some steps an owner can take to achieve the best value:

• Establish project goals and priorities: Clearly define the project goals and priorities, including budget, timeline, quality, and sustainability requirements. This will help guide the decision-making process and ensure that all parties are working towards the same objectives.
• Select the right delivery method: Evaluate the pros and cons of various project delivery methods, including design-bid-build, design-build, integrated project delivery, and design assist. Choose the delivery method that aligns with the project goals and priorities and maximizes collaboration, efficiency, and risk mitigation.
• Assemble the right team: Assemble a team of experienced professionals who can deliver the project goals and priorities within the chosen delivery method. This team should include an architect, engineer, general contractor, and trade contractors who are experienced in the specific project requirements.
• Maximize collaboration: Foster a culture of collaboration and communication among all project team members. Encourage open dialogue and regular meetings to ensure everyone is working towards the same objectives and any issues are addressed in a timely manner.
• Incorporate value engineering: Incorporate value engineering principles throughout the design and construction process. This involves analyzing each component of the project and identifying opportunities to reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve quality without sacrificing the project goals and priorities.
• Monitor progress and adjust as needed: Regularly monitor project progress and adjust the approach as needed to ensure the project goals and priorities are being met. This may involve making changes to the design, construction methods, or timeline to optimize efficiency and minimize risk.

By following these steps, an owner can achieve the best value in the construction process and deliver a successful project outcome that meets the project goals and priorities within the allocated budget and timeline.

Construction budgets prepared by cost consultants are typically lower than ones prepared by design assist trades, what causes this variance?
There can be several reasons for the variance between construction budgets prepared by cost consultants and those prepared by design assist trades. One reason is that cost consultants may not have the same level of expertise and knowledge about the specific construction trades and their associated costs as the design assist trades do. Cost consultants typically rely on historical cost data and general cost estimates, while design assist trades have more specific knowledge of the materials and methods required for the project, which allows them to provide more accurate and detailed cost estimates.
Another reason for the variance is that design assist trades are involved in the project at an earlier stage than cost consultants. This means that they have more time to study the project requirements and develop a more accurate and detailed cost estimate.
Additionally, design assist trades are able to identify potential cost-saving measures and suggest alternative solutions that can reduce overall project costs, which may not be considered by cost consultants.
It is important to note that while design assist trades may provide higher budget estimates than cost consultants, the value they bring to the project in terms of their expertise, knowledge, and ability to identify cost-saving measures can ultimately result in a lower overall project cost and a better value for the owner.

I’m an owner and I want my project built for the cost consultants budget number but my trade costs are higher than expected, why can’t they meet my cost consultants budget?
There are several reasons why your trade costs may be higher than your cost consultant’s budget:

• Scope of Work: The scope of work may have changed or expanded since the initial budget was prepared by the cost consultant. Additional work that was not initially accounted for in the budget may have been added, which can increase the overall cost.
• Design Changes: Design changes can also impact the cost of the project. If design changes are made after the initial budget is prepared, it can result in additional costs.
• Material Costs: Material costs may have increased since the initial budget was prepared. Market conditions, supply chain disruptions, and other factors can impact the cost of materials.
• Labor Costs: Labor costs may have also increased since the initial budget was prepared. Increases in wages, benefits, and other factors can impact the cost of labor.
• Site Conditions: Site conditions may have changed since the initial budget was prepared. If unforeseen conditions are encountered during construction, such as poor soil quality, it can result in additional costs.

It is important to communicate with your design assist trades to understand the reasons for the cost variance and work together to find cost-saving measures or alternative solutions to bring the project back within budget. It may also be necessary to re-evaluate the scope of work and consider making changes to reduce costs. But it is always key to ensure that any changes made do not compromise the quality or safety of the project.

Is my design assist trade the best person to identify value engineering?
While design assist trades can bring valuable expertise and knowledge to the value engineering process, they may not always be the best person to solely identify value engineering opportunities. Value engineering is a collaborative process that involves input from multiple stakeholders, including the owner, architect, engineers, and construction team.
The design assist trade may have specialized knowledge and experience in their area of expertise, such as mechanical or electrical systems, that can be useful in identifying potential cost savings or efficiency improvements. However, they may not have a complete understanding of the overall project goals, budget constraints, or the impact of their proposed changes on other trades or project elements.
Therefore, it is necessary to involve all stakeholders in the value engineering process and consider the potential impact of proposed changes on the overall project. The project team should work collaboratively to identify cost-saving opportunities while ensuring that the project meets the owner’s requirements, design intent, and quality standards.

My construction manager is not a supporter of design assist and would rather I use his trusted trade. My engineer has completed projects with the design assist trade in the past. How do I decide?
As the owner, it is ultimately your decision on which delivery method and trade partner to select for your project. It is important to consider the input and recommendations of your construction manager and engineer, as they bring valuable expertise and knowledge to the decision-making process.
If your construction manager has a trusted trade partner, it may be worthwhile to explore their experience and capabilities in the context of your project. However, it is also important to consider the benefits that a design assist partner can bring to the project, including expertise in their area of specialization, collaboration with the design team, and potentially greater cost certainty.
You can also review the past project experience of your engineer with the design assist trade partner, as this can provide insight into their capabilities, communication style, and overall approach to project delivery.
Ultimately, you should weigh the pros and cons of each option and select the partner that is best suited for your specific project needs and objectives. It may also be helpful to involve all stakeholders in the decision-making process and ensure that everyone is aligned on the final selection.

As a construction manager I believe my project is a good candidate for design assist, how do I approach the owner to convince them this is in their best interest?
As a construction manager, you can approach the owner to convince them that design assist is the best approach for their project in the following ways:

• Educate the owner about the design assist process: Start by explaining what design assist is and how it differs from other construction delivery methods. Provide examples of successful projects that used design assist and explain how the approach can benefit the project.
• Highlight the benefits of design assist: Emphasize the advantages of design assist, such as improved collaboration between the design team and construction team, reduced risk of design errors and omissions, and better cost control.
• Discuss the potential risks: Be transparent about the potential risks involved in the design assist process and how they can be mitigated. Explain how the process can help to identify and address potential issues early on in the project.
• Provide evidence: Provide evidence that design assist can save time and money by reducing change orders and minimizing the need for rework. Share case studies or examples of similar projects that have benefited from the design assist approach.
• Address concerns: If the owner expresses any concerns about the design assist process, address them head-on. Be honest about the potential challenges and limitations of the approach, but explain how these can be overcome.
• Demonstrate your expertise: As a construction manager, you should have experience with different delivery methods and be able to provide insight into why design assist may be the best approach for the specific project. Use your expertise to build the owner’s confidence in the process.
• Develop a plan: If the owner agrees to proceed with design assist, develop a detailed plan that outlines the roles and responsibilities of all parties involved. This plan should include timelines, budgets, and performance metrics to ensure that the project stays on track and within budget.

By following these steps, you can effectively persuade the owner that design assist is the best approach for their project. Remember to be open and honest throughout the process and to address any concerns or objections the owner may have.

Ok I am convinced design assist is the right delivery method for me. How do I find the right trade partners for my project?
Great to hear that you are convinced of the benefits of design assist! Here are some steps you can take to find the right trade partners for your project:

• Research: Start by researching trade partners in your area who have experience with design assist projects. Look for companies that specialize in your specific type of project (e.g. healthcare, education, commercial). Check their portfolios, reviews, and ratings on industry websites, and make sure they have the necessary certifications and licenses.
• Referrals: Ask for referrals from colleagues, industry associations, and professional networks. Referrals from trusted sources can help you find a reliable trade partner with a proven track record of success.
• Interviews: Conduct interviews with potential trade partners to assess their capabilities, experience, and expertise. Ask for references and speak to their past clients to gauge their satisfaction with the trade partner’s work.
• Qualifications: Verify the qualifications of the trade partner, including licenses, certifications, insurance, and bonding requirements. Make sure the trade partner is financially stable and has a good reputation in the industry.
• Value engineering: Look for trade partners who are willing to collaborate with you on value engineering and finding cost-saving solutions. This is an important aspect of the design assist process and can help you achieve better project outcomes.
• Team fit: Finally, make sure the trade partner is a good fit for your project team. The design assist process requires collaboration and communication between all parties, so it’s important to choose a trade partner who is easy to work with and has a similar vision for the project.

Can any trade company do design assist or are there companies who specialize in this delivery method?
While any trade company technically can participate in a design assist project, there are certain companies that may be better suited for this delivery method. These companies often have experience working collaboratively with other trades and have a strong track record of delivering successful projects with a focus on innovation and value engineering.
It is also important to look for companies that have a strong understanding of the project goals and a commitment to open communication and transparency throughout the process. It may be helpful to ask for references and review past projects to ensure that the company has a proven track record in the design assist process.

I am evaluating two trade proposals for design assist, the lower cost option has minimal past experience and the higher cost option has significant experience. How do I decide?
When evaluating two trade proposals for design assist, the decision should not be based solely on cost. While cost is an important factor to consider, other factors such as the trade partner’s experience and qualifications should also be taken into account.
In this scenario, the higher cost option with significant experience may be the better choice. A trade partner with significant experience in design assist can bring many benefits to the project, including a deep understanding of the design process, potential challenges, and best practices for collaboration with the design team. This experience can lead to a smoother design and construction process, fewer change orders, and potentially faster project completion.
On the other hand, a trade partner with minimal experience in design assist may not be as familiar with the process, leading to potential miscommunications, delays, and added costs. In the long run, this could result in a project that exceeds the original budget and timeline.
Overall, while cost is an important consideration, it should not be the only factor when selecting a trade partner for design assist. It is essential to evaluate the trade partner’s experience, qualifications, and ability to collaborate effectively with the design team.

My company does not permit sole sourcing trades however selecting a design assist trade partner would be the best decision for the project. How do I defend the process and explain it to management?
If your company does not permit sole sourcing trades, you may need to adjust the procurement process to ensure that it aligns with company policies. One option is to issue a request for proposal (RFP) for design assist services to multiple potential trade partners. The RFP should include a detailed description of the project, the desired scope of work, and any relevant requirements, such as experience with design assist and relevant certifications.
In the RFP, you can also include a section on the evaluation criteria that will be used to select the design assist trade partner. This should include a detailed breakdown of how you will evaluate each proposal, including factors such as experience, qualifications, approach to the project, and overall cost.
When it comes to justifying the use of design assist, you can present the benefits of this delivery method, including the potential for cost savings, reduced risk, and improved collaboration. You can also explain how design assist is a proven approach to delivering successful construction projects and has been used successfully on similar projects in the past.
It may also be helpful to provide case studies or other examples of successful design assist projects to demonstrate the benefits of this approach. Finally, you can emphasize that while the selection process may differ from the usual procurement process, the ultimate goal remains the same: to deliver a successful project on time and within budget.

I’m an owner looking to build a project. How do I reduce my financial risk on the project?
There are several ways an owner can reduce financial risk on a construction project:

• Use a proven delivery method: Selecting a delivery method that has been proven to be successful in similar projects can help reduce financial risk. Some delivery methods, such as design-assist, can provide greater cost certainty by involving trade partners early in the design process.
• Select experienced team members: Choosing experienced and reputable architects, engineers, contractors, and trade partners can reduce the risk of design and construction errors that could lead to additional costs.
• Have a realistic budget: A realistic budget that takes into account all aspects of the project, including design, materials, labor, and contingency funds, can help reduce the risk of cost overruns.
• Conduct thorough due diligence: Before selecting team members and finalizing plans, conduct thorough due diligence, including reviewing references, past projects, and financial stability.
• Use contracts with clear terms and conditions: Contracts that clearly outline responsibilities, payment schedules, and dispute resolution procedures can reduce the risk of misunderstandings and legal disputes.
• Use insurance and bonding: Proper insurance and bonding can provide financial protection in case of unforeseen events, such as accidents or project delays.
• Monitor the project closely: Regular monitoring and reporting on project progress and costs can help identify potential issues early on and allow for timely corrective action.

Who initiates the design assist process?
Typically, the design assist process is initiated by the owner, but it can also be proposed by the design and construction team. The owner may choose to suggest the use of the design assist approach to their design and construction team or request that the team consider this approach during the early stages of the project.
Alternatively, the design and construction team may propose the use of the design assist approach to the owner based on their experience and knowledge of the project requirements. Ultimately, the decision to proceed with the design assist approach should be made collaboratively, taking into account the project’s specific needs and goals.

In construction I keep hearing about day one costs and day two costs. How does the design assist delivery method affect these?
In construction, “day one costs” refer to the initial capital costs of the project, such as design and construction expenses. “Day two costs” refer to ongoing expenses, such as maintenance and operating costs.
The design assist delivery method can potentially impact both day one and day two costs. During the design and construction phases, design assist can help to identify and minimize potential issues early on, which can ultimately reduce day one costs. By involving trade partners early on in the design process, design assist can lead to more efficient and cost-effective construction methods, as well as the use of materials and systems that are easier to maintain and operate in the long-term, potentially reducing day two costs.
Overall, the design assist delivery method can help to improve the project’s efficiency and reduce both day one and day two costs.

How important is an accurate construction budget to the overall success of my project?
An accurate construction budget is extremely important to the overall success of your project. The budget serves as the foundation for the entire project and guides decisions made throughout the design and construction process. Without an accurate budget, it is difficult to determine what can be included in the project and what must be cut due to budget constraints. Additionally, inaccurate budgets can lead to cost overruns, delays, and disputes between the owner, design team, and contractors.
An accurate budget should be based on a comprehensive understanding of the project scope, including design requirements, materials, labour, and other associated costs. This can be achieved through a thorough analysis of historical cost data, market conditions, and project-specific factors. Working with experienced professionals, such as cost consultants and design assist partners, can help ensure that your budget is realistic and comprehensive.
In short, an accurate construction budget is critical to the success of your project and should be given careful attention and consideration.

My cost consultant uses historical numbers however my trade contractor uses real world current-day pricing. Given the instability in materials costs over the last 2 years, which is a more reliable process?
Both historical data and current day pricing have their own advantages and limitations. Historical data provides a benchmark for comparison and can be useful for identifying trends over time, but it may not reflect current market conditions or changes in technology. On the other hand, current-day pricing reflects the actual costs at the time of the estimate, but it may be more volatile and subject to fluctuations in the market.
Given the instability in materials costs over the last 2 years, it may be more reliable to use current-day pricing to create an accurate construction budget. However, it’s important to note that relying solely on current-day pricing may not capture long-term trends and could potentially result in higher costs if the market experiences a downturn. Therefore, a balanced approach that considers both historical data and current-day pricing may be the most effective in creating an accurate budget. Additionally, it’s important to work with experienced and knowledgeable professionals who can provide insight into the current market conditions and help navigate any uncertainties.

How does a design assist trade provide benefit to the pre-reconstruction scheduling process?
Design assist trade partners can provide significant benefits to the pre-construction scheduling process. Since they are brought on board early in the project, they have the opportunity to work with the project team to develop a detailed construction schedule that takes into account the requirements and constraints of their particular trade. This collaboration can help identify potential conflicts or issues that may arise during construction, and allow for adjustments to be made to the schedule to avoid delays.
Design assist trades can also help ensure that the schedule is realistic and achievable, as they are intimately familiar with the intricacies of their trade and the time required for each task. They can help identify opportunities for sequencing tasks in the most efficient manner, and can provide input on the availability of materials and equipment needed to complete their work.
Overall, involving design assist trades in the pre-construction scheduling process can lead to a more accurate, detailed, and achievable schedule, which can help keep the project on track and minimize delays.

Can I use the design assist process to procure long lead time items for my construction project and how does it benefit the schedule?
Yes, using the design assist process can be an effective way to procure long lead time items for a construction project. By involving the design assist trade partner early on in the project, they can help identify any potential long lead items and work with the design team to develop a solution to procure these items as early as possible.
This process can benefit the schedule in several ways. First, it can help ensure that critical materials are available when needed, which can reduce the risk of delays or schedule extensions. Second, it can allow for more efficient scheduling of other project activities, as the availability of these critical items can be accounted for in the project schedule. Finally, it can help minimize the impact of any unexpected delays or issues that may arise during the construction process, as the project team will have more time to address these issues without impacting the overall schedule.

My project design is almost complete, is it too late to use the design assist process?
Has the delay in engaging them reduced the benefit they provide?
It is not too late to use the design assist process, even if the design is almost complete. While engaging a design assist partner earlier in the process may provide more opportunities for value engineering and cost savings, there can still be benefits to engaging a design assist partner at a later stage.
For example, a design assist partner can help identify constructability issues that may not have been considered during the design phase and can provide input on ways to improve the construction process. Additionally, the design assist partner can still provide input on long lead-time items and assist with procurement.
However, it is important to note that delaying the engagement of a design assist partner may reduce the amount of time available for the design assist partner to provide input, potentially impacting the overall benefit they can provide to the project.

I am commencing design on my project, do I engage my engineer first or my design assist trade?
Is there a benefit to who’s onboard first?
It is typically best to engage your engineer first as they will be responsible for creating the design documents and specifications that will guide the construction process. However, it may be beneficial to engage with a design assist trade early in the process to provide input and recommendations on design decisions that may impact construction costs or timelines. Additionally, early engagement with a design assist trade can help identify potential value engineering opportunities and provide insight into constructability issues that may arise during the construction process. Ultimately, the decision on who to engage first will depend on the specific needs and goals of your project.

Can my design assist trade also be my engineer or is there a conflict?
It is possible for a design assist trade to also be the engineer for a project, but there may be a conflict of interest. The engineer is typically responsible for providing objective and independent advice to the owner, while the design assist trade is responsible for providing construction-related advice and coordination during the design process.
If the design assist trade is also serving as the engineer, it is important to establish clear roles and responsibilities to ensure that there is no conflict of interest and that the best interests of the project are being served. Additionally, the engineer must comply with ethical and professional standards that require them to provide objective advice and avoid conflicts of interest.

I am deciding between two possible design assist partners for my project. One is the largest trade in thier discipline and the other specializes in design assist but is significantly smaller in overall company size. Should size matter?
While size can be a factor to consider when selecting a design assist partner for your project, it should not be the determining factor. Both larger and smaller companies can have strengths and weaknesses that may or may not align with your project goals and needs.
For example, a larger company may have more resources and experience, but may also be less flexible and have more bureaucratic processes. On the other hand, a smaller company may be more agile and specialized, but may have less resources and experience.
When evaluating potential design assist partners, it is important to consider factors such as their experience in similar projects, their expertise and specialization, their track record of delivering quality work on time and on budget, their ability to collaborate with your project team, and their approach to risk management and problem-solving.
Ultimately, the best design assist partner for your project is the one that can provide the most value and aligns with your project goals and values.

Bigger is always better when it comes to a trade partner, right?
Not necessarily. While larger trade partners may have more resources and capacity, smaller trade partners may offer more personalized attention and flexibility in the design assist process.
It ultimately depends on the specific needs and goals of the project. It’s important to evaluate potential trade partners based on their experience, expertise, track record, and ability to meet project requirements, rather than solely on their size.

How does design assist affect the construction coordination process?
Design assist can positively impact the construction coordination process in several ways.
Firstly, by involving the design assist trade early in the design process, they can provide input on constructability and identify potential coordination issues. This can help avoid conflicts and delays that may arise during construction, which can ultimately save time and money.
Secondly, the design assist trade can work collaboratively with the other trades involved in the project to ensure that their work is coordinated and integrated properly. This can help minimize conflicts and reduce the need for costly rework during construction.
Finally, the design assist trade can provide detailed shop drawings and other construction documents that clearly depict the location and installation of their work. This can help the construction team better understand how the various systems and components will fit together, which can help ensure a smoother and more efficient construction process.
Overall, by involving the design assist trade early in the process and fostering collaboration and coordination, design assist can help improve the constructability of a project and reduce the risk of delays and cost overruns.

Using mechanical and electrical trades specifically, how does using design assist generate greater project value?
There are several ways in which you can generate greater project value by using design assist in mechanical and electrical trades.

• Collaboration between trades: Design assist allows for closer collaboration between the mechanical and electrical trades, which can result in more efficient and effective design solutions. By involving these trades early in the design process, they can work together to identify potential conflicts and find solutions that work for both systems.
• Value engineering: The design assist process allows for early identification of areas where value engineering can be applied. By involving the mechanical and electrical trades early in the design process, they can work together to find cost-saving solutions without sacrificing performance or quality.
• Constructability: Design assist can improve constructability by identifying potential issues before construction begins. By working with the mechanical and electrical trades early in the design process, the construction team can identify potential conflicts and develop solutions that can be incorporated into the construction documents.
• Innovation: By involving the mechanical and electrical trades early in the design process, design assist can facilitate the development of innovative solutions that can improve project performance and efficiency. This can result in better building performance, reduced energy consumption, and lower operating costs over the life of the building.

Overall, design assist can improve the performance, efficiency, and value of a project by involving the mechanical and electrical trades early in the design process and facilitating collaboration and innovation.

I have a construction contract and documents that contain notes that everything possibly required is included. Is it realistic to expect there will be no additional costs?
No.
It is not realistic to expect that there will be no additional costs in a construction project, even if the contract and documents contain notes that everything possibly required is included. The reality of construction is that unexpected issues can arise during the project that may require additional work or materials. Additionally, changes to the design or scope of work may be requested by the owner, which would result in additional costs. It is important for owners to budget for contingencies and potential change orders to avoid unexpected financial impacts on the project.

My design team tells me not to worry about contract changes during construction, is this realistic given I am using design assist?
While design assist can help minimize changes during construction by involving the trade partners early in the process, it is still wise and necessary to be prepared for potential contract changes. Even with the involvement of the trade partners during the design phase, unforeseen issues can arise during construction that may require changes to the contract. It is important to have a contingency plan in place to address these changes, such as a change order process, to ensure that the project stays on track and within budget.

Is design assist an open book process? Can I ask the trade contractor to show me all their costs to date?
Yes, design assist is generally an open book process, and you should be able to request to see all the costs associated with the trade contractor’s work. The trade contractor is typically required to submit detailed cost estimates, progress reports, and change orders throughout the project, which should give you insight into their costs. It’s important to have transparency in the process to ensure that the project stays on budget and that any changes are made in a timely and efficient manner. BUT,, it’s also important to respect the trade contractor’s proprietary information and not to misuse or disclose it without their consent.

Should the design assist contractor have a financial loss on my project, am I at risk to cover the loss?
What if the loss is due to scheduling slippage by my general contractor or other unrelated trades to the design assist trade?
This is another excellent question and entirely possible.
That’s why the terms of financial responsibility in case of loss should be clearly defined in the contract between the owner and the design assist contractor. Typically, if the loss is due to the fault or negligence of the design assist contractor, they would be responsible for covering the loss. However, if the loss is due to factors outside of their control, such as scheduling slippage by the general contractor or unrelated trades, the responsibility for the loss may be shared among the parties involved.
It’s vital to have a clear understanding of the financial responsibilities and liabilities of all parties involved in the project, and to have these clearly defined in the contract. It is also important to have effective communication and collaboration among all parties to minimize the risk of losses and to address any issues that may arise in a timely and efficient manner.

My design assist contractor is asking for a contract value increase due to changes in design from the base line drawings on which the budget was created, to the issued for construction drawings. Is this cost request reasonable?
It is not uncommon for design changes to occur during the construction process, and these changes can affect the cost of the project. But it’s always imperative to review the contract language to determine whether or not the design assist contractor is entitled to a contract value increase due to changes in design.
If the contract includes provisions for changes in scope and corresponding adjustments to contract value, then the request may be reasonable. Then again, if the contract specifies that the design assist contractor is responsible for adhering to the issued for construction drawings and any deviations will not be compensated, then the request may not be justified.
Always make sure to review the change order process outlined in the contract to determine the appropriate steps for addressing the design changes and associated cost impacts. This may involve negotiating the scope and cost of the changes with the design assist contractor and obtaining approval from the owner and other relevant parties before proceeding with the work.